Category Archives: Science

Bogoslof Volcano in Alaska Unexpectedly Erupts

A sudden explosive eruption rocked Bogoslof in the Aleutian Islands according to the Alaska Volcano Observatory. The eruption was noticed by pilots flying close to the remote volcano as well as satellite images (see below) that revealed an ash plume reaching up 10 kilometers (32,000 feet). Nevertheless impressive that plume might be, it appears the eruption didn’t continue overly long, as aviators passing the volcano less than an hour afterwards noted considerably diminished task.

Update 10:30 am EST on 12/22: Bogoslof had a second large explosive during the nighttime that is eruption of 12/21. The plume might have been marginally taller in relation to the initial explosion, topping out at 10.6 kilometers (35,000 feet). Just using the explosions ending within thirty minutes, the activity was short-lived, like the initial eruption. These eruptions happen to be full of volcanic lightning (see below), which can be feature of vulcanian eruptions that eject mainly old stuff in the vent region (Note: after some discussion with folks in the know, these eruptions likely possess a lot of interaction with seawater, creating fine ashes that’s prone to lightning. This Surtseyan style of eruption is a mix of new magma and water to make several of the dramatic explosions). Vulcanian eruptions may be the opening salvo of longer intervals of action or isolated events, so Bogoslof will be very fascinating to observe over the the next couple of weeks. Orange/Watch status is now sat at by the volcano.

Bogoslof doesn’t look like much, only a small island in the Bering Sea, should you examine a map. However, when you consider the fact that the volcano increases 1,500 meters (~4,900 feet) from the seafloor, you can appreciate that it isn’t a tiny characteristic. The past known eruption of Bogoslof was in 1992 when it created a VEI 3 eruption along with a dome that is new. On the isle, it has produced a half dozen VEI 2-3 volatile events from distinct vents since 1796. Numerous little islands gone over the last 400 years as lava domes have formed during eruptions of Bogoslof and have come, simply to be eroded or destroyed. Today, just about 300 meters (~1,000 feet) of the volcano sticks above the ocean waters in the kind of striking spires of lava. It is going to be intriguing to find out in the event the new eruption is the beginning of a fresh dome-building period at Bogoslof like those that happened in 1883 and 1796.

There is nothing in the way of realtime tracking (like seismometers) for a volcano like Bogoslof, all alone in the Bering Sea north of Unalaska. The rapid notices in the Volcano Ash Advisory Centers (VAAC) about eruptions like this one from an unanticipated source like Bogoslof are critical for air traffic controllers and airlines to change paths and avoid volcanic ash hazards for aircraft.

A Year in Gravitational Waves, and Dark Energy, Antimatter

2016 held some wonderful physics instants—hello gravitational waves! Like shining a laser beam through antimatter, other moments were experimentally striking, but don’t have exactly the same oomph as colliding black holes. And some were just not completely inflate: Dark matter still won’t reveal itself. However, every experimental let down opens up new avenues for inquiry. The things physicists did, and didn’t, discover in 2016 are hints about what to anticipate in the science in the coming years.
Hopes for a New Particle, Destroyed

In late December 2015 CERN, the European center for high energy physics research, released data showing that there may be a fresh particle afoot. A kind of neutrino? Though scientists said it was perhaps (even probably) a statistical fluke, delight spread like a shockwave. In just a month, scientists had posted 500 theoretical articles related to the particle on the preprint arXiv server.

But dreams of post-Standard Model physics were dashed as days lengthened into summer. Nope. And, as the Large Hadron Collider went to bed this month for the remaining year, the machine had failed to show the strategy to a brand-new particle.
Yay, We Found Gravitational Waves!

A century after Albert Einstein’s forecast, physicists supported the presence of gravitational waves by detecting ripples in spacetime created when two black holes crashed together 1.4 billion years ago. He believed such signals would not be so strong humans would never have the ability to find them. Scientists at the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory were pleased to prove him both right and wrong.

Team LIGO has spent much of 2016 updating its observatories in Washington and Louisiana after declaring their discover in February. And in late November, LIGO began listening again, straining to hear new ripples. Together with the recent launching of their citizen science program “Gravity Spy,” you can help them tune in.

LUX wrapped up its observations in May. But in July, it declared that it had not found any telltale signals of WIMPs. And while, yes, this is a little bit of a bummer, physicists aren’t giving up on the investigation. The LUX-ZEPLIN experiment will replace LUX in the Sanford Underground Research Facility. It should have 70 times the sensitivity of LUX and is anticipated to be running in 2020 and up.

This summer the BOSS program released its map—the greatest ever, containing more than a million galaxies, allowing physicists to make the most effective estimates yet of the poorly comprehended “dark energy” that’s accelerating the expansion of the universe. What exactly does a map of a million galaxies look like? Kind of like Jackson Pollock wed a pointillist.
Identical Twin Particles end up being Exceptional

Matter and antimatter are clearly different— the universe is dominated by matter, while scientists can only just catch snippets of antimatter. But why this is so is a puzzle. The Standard Model says the two should be basically the same, so any indicators that they can break so-called charge-parity symmetry can offer clues to why the universe favored matter over antimatter.

In summer, the T2K Cooperation, located in Japan, presented one such clue. They trained a neutrino beam in the Super Kamiokande underground detector in Kamioka — and when they measured them, they saw more electron neutrinos and fewer electron antineutrinos than would be expected. What this means is unclear, but the path could light toward understanding the difference between antimatter and matter.
Color for the First Time of Antimatter Seen

Late-breaking news rounded out the year in physics. The ALPHA collaboration saw, for the very first time, the colour of antimatter.

Simply managing to make this kind of comparison is an accomplishment of engineering that is experimental.

The Mainstream Media Melted Down as Fake News Festered

Conventional news outlets have endured hardships for a while now. The rise of web publishing and content that was free started sabotaging once precious magazines and papers decades past now. And prolong the whims of the social media platforms that hold news organizations’ fortune in their own hands and those left standing are made to experiment with new business models.

But this last year in American media has been harsher than most. The election inspired more compared to the typical quantity of tribalism online, and citizens’ trust in traditional media dropped to an all-time low: just 32 percent told Gallup they have a great deal or fair amount of trust in the media.

The way to Fight the Bad Sense of the Internet | Argument Practice

Along came the fake news stories and hyper-partisan sites that were more than pleased to release unrecognizable hyperbole and all out lies. The stories didn’t have to be accurate—the public had lost faith in the fact checkers—they just needed to support present beliefs are ’sed by a particular subset of people. And if they did, people would share them. The more people shared by prioritizing them, them, the more Facebook would reward their publishers. By August, one Buzzfeed analysis showed, fake news was increasingly outperforming the very best stories in the 19 major news outlets.
But it wasn’t just these new media platforms—and yes, Facebook is one—that faced an existential crisis. It was occurring on television, also. From the moment Trump took that fated escalator ride down to the lobby of Trump Tower to declare his bid cable news networks like MSNBC and CNN kept their cameras locked on Trump. By September, he previously received 10 times as numerous references on leading television networks as Dr. Ben Carson, his nearest competition for time on air. By the finish of the race, Trump have been mentioned on television 1.26 million times, twice as many times as Hillary Clinton.

As CBS chairman Les Moonves said in the time (and presumably came to regret), Trump’s overexposure “may not be great for America, but it’s damn great for CBS.”
Once it was clear Trump had become a significant rival for the White House, these same networks tried to fact-check him in the minute, with many a viral chyron in the base of the display. “Trump’s Son: Daddy Apologized to Khans (He’sn’t).” A valiant attempt, but for all those who hadn’t already altered the channel, it seems like additional confirmation the media, as Trump often alleged, had it out for him.

The feeling of futility didn’t finish there. As media distrust festered, the man who would become president-elect was assembling a media outlet of his own. On Twitter, he issued leading statements— and leading disses his feed turning into a source plus a competitor for other reporters. Using an competitive digital advertising campaign that helped win him the White House, he expanded his following on Facebook. Who wanted a net packed with think pieces when voters could get fervent and regular updates on Trump direct from your source?

Which brings us to December. Trump working hard to further undermine trust in the press and remains tweeting. The press is simultaneously attempting to decide when a tweet from the soon-to-be president makes up breaking news and when it ought to be written off as a rant. Mark Zuckerberg, meanwhile, is eventually coming around to the theory that maybe, just possibly, Facebook has more influence on people’s political beliefs than he considered. Recently, he announced hoax news sites will no further be able to market on Facebook and that the business is rolling out verification, reporting, and detection tools to allow it to be simpler to spot bogus stories.

After a really grueling year for the media industry, the most difficult part is yet to come, although it’s a start. If 2016 was about dismantling institutions of every shape and size, 2017 will have to be about figuring out where to set them and picking up the pieces.

Let’s Take A Look

Let’s look at some volcanic rumblings and eruptions from the past week:

Washington

Mount St. Helens is keeping up its unsettled 2016, this time with another small earthquake swarm. The USGS detected over 120 earthquakes over the previous couple of days, all happening 2-4 kilometers (1-2 miles) beneath the volcano and all very little (less than M1). These earthquakes, such as the ones that happened before this season, are probably caused by magma moving or faults adjusting as pressure changes within the magmatic system underneath Mount St. Helens. It does n’t alter the condition of the volcano: It’s active, taking what’ll probably be a short rest before its next eruption. That could still be years from now.

Kamchatka

The ashes floated chiefly to the NNE but luckily no one lives in that direction (or pretty much anywhere close to Shiveluch). Due to air traffic within the area, an orange aviation alert was raised to warn airlines of the Shiveluch ash plume.

Some bits that are brief:

Because of cracking on the volcano antennas on Irazu in Costa Rica will need to be moved. Whether this cracking is related to any potential changes in the volcano or only faulting of surface blocks is cloudy.
A small explosion happened from the peak Halema’uma’u crater at Kilauea when part of the crater wall fell to the lava lake. You see some remarkable chunks of debris fly at the camera, both in the kind of old wall rock and lava in the lava lake and can view video. This can be a fairly common event but can disperse ash and debris across the summit area of the Hawaiian volcano.
A growth in seismicity was noticed at Cayambe in Ecuador. The earthquakes were all small with one as large as M3.6 that lasted a few days. Much like St. Helens, this rumbling is likely merely a hint that the volcano is recharging, but no eruption seems to be forthcoming according the the Instituto Geofísico (IG). The past known eruption from Cayambe was in 1785.

North Island of New Zealand

The North Island of New Zealand is chock full of volcanoes—and big volcanoes at that. No less than four big calderas stay in the Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ) that stretches from White Island in the north to Ruapehu in the south. Some of the very violent volcanic eruptions in human history occurred in ~186 AD. over the caldera, what we call an “ultraplinian” eruption (and whatever is “ultra” has to be enormous). More recently, Tarawera in the Okataina caldera erupted in 1886 in one of the most explosive basaltic (low silica) eruptions on record that had ash plume that reached 10 kilometers (~32,000 feet) and buried a number of towns along with blasting a new valley out of the landscape. The North Island is definitely a place where volcanic unrest is taken.

Thus, the somewhat surprising steam explosions that took place this week have caught a lot of people’s focus. A sizable steam explosion occurred near the coastlines. Afterward, on December 30, the caldera had a second, smaller explosion. The function was brief and around by morning, so very few people really saw the explosion occur. This came as a surprise the volcano observation agency of New Zealand, to GNS Science and was the first hydrothermal explosion at Rotorua in 15 years. Folks close to the explosion reported hearing low, rumbling noises before the blast, which probably were brought on by the movement of hot water and steam subsurface.

The 2nd explosion came on Wednesday (November 30) and this one was caught on video. In that occasion, you may begin to see the lake surface begin to churn with hefty steam and dark material (likely sediment from the lake bottom). This blast appears considerably smaller, with water and debris just reaching several meters (10 feet) over the lake surface.

Hydrothermal explosions such as all these are common in calderas. But, the trigger of those explosions is not clear. GNS Science has implied they might be associated with the recent spate of earthquakes New Zealand has experienced since the M7.8 on November 13. This could make sense: Hydrothermal systems under volcanoes are proven to readjust after earthquakes because of movement on the faults that riddle the earth beneath the TVZ. Brad Scott from GNS Science implied that it’s likely linked to what triggered the first blast, and the next blast might have also been related to recent weather.

Nonetheless, Scott has said that these new steam explosions do not imply that the Rotorua caldera is heading towards any kind of volcanic activity; GNS Science hasn’t increased the alert status for the volcanic system. Steam explosions are driven by building up of steam before the cap of rock above can’t hold the pressure— . These steam explosions, although relatively infrequent at Rotorua, do occur and no eruption has occurred near the lake in 25,000 years. The explosions that occurred during the 1980s- drilling probably helped along 2001 during efforts to exploit the hydrothermal system.

Anybody who has been to Rotorua can attest to its volcanic nature (see previously). There are geysers and mudpots on one side of town, including the Pohutu geyser that is remarkable, buildings happen to be closed due to volcanic gases seeping into their cellars, and several sewer grates steam from heat and the gases of the magma deep below the road. It is actually a remarkable place, as if a small city was built by you right in addition to the hydrothermal aspects of Yellowstone Caldera. Although steam explosions such as these two might look spectacular, they’re not signals of impending destruction at Rotorua, but instead simply continuing evidence of the volcanic nature of New Zealand.

Super Mario Run

Of course I ’m not the first to examine the physics in Super Mario Bros—there was this fascinating paper considering the jump that is optimal to get at the end of the level to the maximal point on the flag. There’s also a good page studying the acceleration of jumping Mario in the games that are different. Good items.

But there’s a new game out—Super Mario Run on Android and iOS. It is a good opportunity to take another look at the physics of Mario.
Video Investigation

Then use video analysis and the simplest way to get information from a video game is to capture the activity. With video evaluation, I can get spot-time information by looking at the positioning of the object in each frame. There are enough significant details that I really could actually write a novel on video analysis (which I did), so I’ll just contain some notes.

How can you get video from your own phone to your own personal computer? I like this superb trick for the iPhone with an Apple computer. Connect the telephone to the computer with USB and then you can record the screen as a picture with QuickTime. Yes, this can be very helpful.
What software should you utilize? Logger Pro is pretty affordable and several students are already familiar with it, although tracker has more tools and is free.
What do you do about the moving background? Yes, this really is an issue. Essentially you must move the origin of the coordinate system for each frame—but this isn’t not too easy.
How in regards to the scale? How enormous is Mario? OK, this is catchier. There are really three important things: the acceleration, the scale, and also the frame rate. In the event that you know two of those things, the third can be found by you. However, what about in this event? I will be really going to start off with the assumption that the frame rate is “real time” and then utilize a space scale of one coin. After that, I will decide what things to do.

Projectile Motion

I ‘m first going to take a look at the position of Mario as he runs (before he leaps). Here’s what I get.

Data Tool

I’m not sure what was going on during that first part. I think I got part of the motion in which Mario was still in the air. But anyway, the rest looks fairly linear. Considering that the horizontal velocity is the speed of change of position, the gradient of the line would be the x-pace.

Also, check this out. Here is Mario’s y-position as he runs.

Data Tool

It looks like he takes about 0.2 seconds per step. I’m not sure if that’s useful or significant, but I’ve said it so I’ll now move on.

He should just be like projectile motion, after Mario leaves on the ground. For projectile motion, the following should apply:

On World, the vertical acceleration would be 9.8 m/s2 because there’s only the gravitational force pulling down.
Since there aren’t any horizontal forces, the flat speed should really be steady.

But is the horizontal rate continuous? Listed here is a plot of x-location as a function of time throughout the jump.

Info Tool

Superb. A constant horizontal reasonably much like the running rate of Mario, and velocity. How about the perpendicular motion?

Data Tool

This does not reveal a constant acceleration. This can be not a parabola. On the contrary, it resembles a constant perpendicular rate going up constant acceleration at the top followed by constant speed going down.

Since the top of the hop looks like constant acceleration, I fit a quadratic equation. Taking a look at the fit parameters, this might provide a vertical acceleration of -6.3 coins/s2.
How Big Is Mario?

Now for many fun. Assume that Mario lives on Earth and also the acceleration on top of the hop should indeed be -9.8 m/s2. I can utilize this to get the size of 1 coin and then find the size of other things. I’d like to just place those two accelerations equivalent to every other.

La te xi t 1

The units could be treated just just like a variable to ensure I’m able ot solve for the connection between meters and coins.

The diameter of 1 coin would be 1.56 meters (5.12 feet). Wow. Looking at Mario, he’s 1.26 coins tall or 1.97 meters (6.5 feet). His height does n’t truly disturb me, that seems reasonable—it’s the size of his head that is certainly insane huge.
Homework

Clearly, there are a few questions that are unanswered. Here are some on your assignments.

In Super Mario Run, addititionally there is a double jump. So how exactly does this work? What are the results to the acceleration? What about the flat rate? Yes, I understand that’s three questions in one.
Why are the downward and upward vertical velocities almost continuous?
Inside my example, there was a little different in the downward and upward rates. Is this always true?
How about those coins? Estimate the volume and utilize that to ascertain approximate value and the mass if they’ve been manufactured from gold.
Make a numerical model in python that correctly models a jump Mario. Honestly, I might do this one— just.

That Special Time Of Year

This would be an officially labeled time of the entire year. I propose we call it Maker Time—it’s that time after kids get out of school, but before all of the holiday festivities begin. This can be an ideal time for kids (and adults) to make something. This really is what I tell my own personal children (I probably heard it from someone else).

A consumer purchases things but in addition sees videos, plays video games, reads books, plays with toys. A manufacturer creates material—it can be a short story, a video, a video game, anything, as well as a plaything.

I think that all too often people focus on the consuming side of being a human and not enough on the making side. Children are most likely out of school and perhaps they don’t have to do. Now is an ideal time.

It can be difficult to get started, so I’m going to provide you with some of my personal favorite notions. I’m not likely to give with regards to details. The notion of making something is to be creative and not only follow a set of instructions. I don’t need you to feel constrained in anyway, although it’s not incorrect to own directions.
This one is superb. It’s quite creative and not difficult to do. Really you just need a phone or a tablet PC using a camera. There are tons of programs out there which will work for both iOS and Android—just do a fast search. Oh, you might also want a tripod or at least something to hold the camera fixed while you move things about. So you can line things, a few of these programs also provide a sort of ghost view of the last framework. They are in fact quite nice.

Stopmotionexample

Using Lego bits with all the mini-figs works excellent since you can place them in numerous ways, once it’s finished but kids can also use their preferred playthings and narration over the video.
Make Various Other Video

There is a video camera having a mobile studio right in the control on most folks—a smart phone. It could possibly be a short scene or show the way to cook something. Go interview some humans that are older and ask them questions that are intriguing. What was it like prior to the net? What is an experience you remember that kids now may not be familiar with? That could be entertaining.
Build Something Electronic

Have children really make something. No, it doesn’t have to be super complex as an internet-enabled robot (but that might be cool). Allow me to recommend two projects which are interesting, very flexible, and safe.

First, a buzz bot could be built by kids. All these are essentially just small structures having an off- electric motor that is balanced. When the motor turns, it gets the whole device (the “robot”) tremble and thus it moves. It’s very simple to produce and kind of trendy. It is loved by everyone.

Buzzbot 1

Here it is possible to see these bots that are buzz use golf tees and also a CD to get a base. Hot glue and duct tape work amazing. If you’d like to make multiple ones, add some magnets on the side and watch them interact with each other.

Second, an LED flash light can be recommended by me.

Ledflashlight

This can be the torch my daughter made. She was pumped up. It was made from wire a cardboard tube, and a couple of LEDs. She decorated it the way she liked it and it absolutely was amazing.
Take Something Apart

You may not think of this as “making something”, and perhaps you happen to be right. Nonetheless, this is still enjoyable and extremely helpful. But what could you take apart? Here are some suggestions:

Old telephone.
Magnetic drive. You might need a unique torx screwdriver, but you’ll acquire some magnets that are amazing, should you get it open. Mirrors that are great are also made by disc platters.
Broken toy that was motorized. See should you get get out the motor and then make it function again. You can utilize this to build something new.
Other electronics. What in regards to a printer or CD player? Those have great things in them too.

You can find likely some things you need to avoid taking apart. Items with big capacitors are of course dangerous (like an old CRT type TV). Even be careful of items with super sharp parts like a knife thrower that is robotic.
Build With Cardboard

Who hasn’t and a cardboard box played? I remember using larger boxes to create a submarine (no, not a genuine one). But you can do substantially better. You can also get help. Try doing an internet search for “cardboard armor”. Yes, this is fairly cool. With just some cardboard and tape you can make something amazing.

Photo Google Photographs

OK, technically in this example some foam board was used by my son too. Still, this could have been created with only cardboard. Or maybe this is just another excellent example that we now have no rules. Anything goes when you’re building up things.
Computer Programming

Then stay on the computer, in the event you don’t want to get off the computer —but make something. You may be surprised at how accessible computer programming has become. Children of most ages make and can easily start material. Listed here is a random moving soccer ball I made—just for you.

All the code is finished using a graphical interface by dragging “code blocks.” You can actually do a bunch of information with this, simply take a look at the examples other users have posted.

Oh, but perhaps you would like to know even more? Check out code.org where you’ll find some extremely outstanding coding tutorials for all ages.
Other Items and Resources

The most crucial part of making things would be to locate something which you appreciate—but this might be anything so long as you are making material. Create stuff, and share the stuff you love. It’s fantastic and there are no rules. Don’t go buy expensive equipment, simply get by with the things you have around you (at least at first).

Here are some other resources for you personally.

You should watch this excellent TED discussion by Adam Savage in which he shares his love of building costumes.
Check on-line websites like the Manufacturer subreddit out or Make Magazine.
Should you discover something you intend to work on, both YouTube and Instructables are extremely useful (also just hunt on the internet for things).

The Science of Jumping in Super Mario Run

Of course I ’m not the first to examine the physics in Super Mario Bros—there was this fascinating paper considering the jump that is optimal to get at the end of the level to the maximal point on the flag. There’s also a good page studying the acceleration of jumping Mario in the games that are different. Good items.

But there’s a new game out—Super Mario Run on Android and iOS. It is a good opportunity to take another look at the physics of Mario.
Video Investigation

Then use video analysis and the simplest way to get information from a video game is to capture the activity. With video evaluation, I can get spot-time information by looking at the positioning of the object in each frame. There are enough significant details that I really could actually write a novel on video analysis (which I did), so I’ll just contain some notes.

How can you get video from your own phone to your own personal computer? I like this superb trick for the iPhone with an Apple computer. Connect the telephone to the computer with USB and then you can record the screen as a picture with QuickTime. Yes, this can be very helpful.
What software should you utilize? Logger Pro is pretty affordable and several students are already familiar with it, although tracker has more tools and is free.
What do you do about the moving background? Yes, this really is an issue. Essentially you must move the origin of the coordinate system for each frame—but this isn’t not too easy.
How in regards to the scale? How enormous is Mario? OK, this is catchier. There are really three important things: the acceleration, the scale, and also the frame rate. In the event that you know two of those things, the third can be found by you. However, what about in this event? I will be really going to start off with the assumption that the frame rate is “real time” and then utilize a space scale of one coin. After that, I will decide what things to do.

Projectile Motion

I ‘m first going to take a look at the position of Mario as he runs (before he leaps). Here’s what I get.

Data Tool

I’m not sure what was going on during that first part. I think I got part of the motion in which Mario was still in the air. But anyway, the rest looks fairly linear. Considering that the horizontal velocity is the speed of change of position, the gradient of the line would be the x-pace.

Also, check this out. Here is Mario’s y-position as he runs.

Data Tool

It looks like he takes about 0.2 seconds per step. I’m not sure if that’s useful or significant, but I’ve said it so I’ll now move on.

He should just be like projectile motion, after Mario leaves on the ground. For projectile motion, the following should apply:

On World, the vertical acceleration would be 9.8 m/s2 because there’s only the gravitational force pulling down.
Since there aren’t any horizontal forces, the flat speed should really be steady.

But is the horizontal rate continuous? Listed here is a plot of x-location as a function of time throughout the jump.

Info Tool

Superb. A constant horizontal reasonably much like the running rate of Mario, and velocity. How about the perpendicular motion?

Data Tool

This does not reveal a constant acceleration. This can be not a parabola. On the contrary, it resembles a constant perpendicular rate going up constant acceleration at the top followed by constant speed going down.

Since the top of the hop looks like constant acceleration, I fit a quadratic equation. Taking a look at the fit parameters, this might provide a vertical acceleration of -6.3 coins/s2.
How Big Is Mario?

Now for many fun. Assume that Mario lives on Earth and also the acceleration on top of the hop should indeed be -9.8 m/s2. I can utilize this to get the size of 1 coin and then find the size of other things. I’d like to just place those two accelerations equivalent to every other.

La te xi t 1

The units could be treated just just like a variable to ensure I’m able ot solve for the connection between meters and coins.

The diameter of 1 coin would be 1.56 meters (5.12 feet). Wow. Looking at Mario, he’s 1.26 coins tall or 1.97 meters (6.5 feet). His height does n’t truly disturb me, that seems reasonable—it’s the size of his head that is certainly insane huge.
Homework

Clearly, there are a few questions that are unanswered. Here are some on your assignments.

In Super Mario Run, addititionally there is a double jump. So how exactly does this work? What are the results to the acceleration? What about the flat rate? Yes, I understand that’s three questions in one.
Why are the downward and upward vertical velocities almost continuous?
Inside my example, there was a little different in the downward and upward rates. Is this always true?
How about those coins? Estimate the volume and utilize that to ascertain approximate value and the mass if they’ve been manufactured from gold.
Make a numerical model in python that correctly models a jump Mario. Honestly, I might do this one— just.